彩神彩票漏洞|彩神彩票官网

来源：彩神彩票网址2024-03-02 17:48

中国代表呼吁国际社会继续支持伊拉克打击恐怖主义******

　　中新社联合国2月2日电联合国安理会2日举行伊拉克问题公开会。中国常驻联合国副代表戴兵在会上呼吁国际社会继续支持伊拉克打击恐怖主义，肃清“伊斯兰国”等恐怖极端势力，防止其回流蔓延，巩固来之不易的反恐成果。

　　当天，联合国秘书长伊拉克问题特别代表亨尼斯-普拉斯哈特作通报。她表示，约三个月前，伊拉克国民议会选举产生新一任总统并确认新一届政府构成，结束了长达一年多的紧张局势、政治不和与权力较量。她敦促伊拉克政界把握机遇期，处理好腐败、安全、社会发展、公共服务等问题，让这个国家彻底摆脱不稳定与脆弱的循环。

　　戴兵发言说，当前，伊拉克安全形势依然严峻，恐怖残余势力仍在不断发动不对称袭击，造成包括平民在内的人员伤亡。联合国收集“伊斯兰国”在伊罪证调查组要尽快向伊拉克移交所收集证据，助力伊拉克根据本国法律将恐怖分子绳之以法。中方欢迎伊拉克持续推进叙利亚霍尔营地内伊拉克公民的遣返和安置工作，敦促有关国家像伊拉克一样负起责任，尽快推进在伊外国恐怖作战分子及其家属的甄别和遣返。

　　戴兵表示，根据秘书长报告，战争遗留爆炸物和简易爆炸装置持续造成伊拉克平民伤亡，是伊拉克儿童伤亡的主要原因。这些爆炸物很多都是二十年前战争留下来的，当年发动战争的国家应该主动站出来，在帮助伊拉克扫雷、援助受害者等方面拿出实际行动。

　　戴兵说，伊拉克的和平离不开稳定的地区环境。中方多次强调，伊拉克不是地缘争夺的博弈场。中方支持伊拉克同地区国家发展睦邻友好关系，共同应对跨境挑战。中方呼吁有关各方尊重伊拉克主权、独立和领土完整，通过同伊拉克政府开展合作的方式解决自身安全关切。

　　戴兵说，过去几十年，伊拉克饱受战争冲击，人民历尽苦难。国际社会应当积极帮助伊拉克重建基础设施，加快经济社会发展，增进民生福祉。联合国伊拉克援助团(联伊援助团)等联合国在伊机构要把资源和精力更多投向伊拉克人民最需要的优先领域，按照授权和彼此分工开展工作，充分发挥国家工作队的作用。今年是联伊援助团成立20周年，有必要以此为契机，在征求伊拉克意见基础上，对联伊援助团工作和绩效进行系统总结和评估，并就特派团中长期前景进行认真研究。

　　戴兵说，中方将继续坚定支持伊拉克维护国家主权、独立、领土完整，将继续支持伊方开展经济重建，帮助伊方恢复工业、改善民生、实现可持续发展。中方愿同国际社会一道，为伊拉克长治久安、为地区和平发展作出积极贡献。(完)

彩神彩票漏洞

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.